Categories : fleet repair

 
Attempting to clear up the truck safety picture

The truck crash death rate has actually dropped 40.6 % over the previous decade, ATA states. (Image by Sean Kilcarr/Fleet Owner) While truck crash information continues to reveal a positive security trend, the just recently revamped Security Measurement System (SMS) put in place by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration might only muddle the waters, leading numerous to believe the market is not as safe as the information indicates. “& ldquo; The problem with the new SMS is that there’& rsquo; s an absence of context, compared to the” method it utilized to be, & rdquo; Laura McMillan, vice president of training development for Instructional Technologies, Inc., explained to Fleet Owner. FMCSA had removed SMS data from public view last month in reaction to Congress’ & rsquo; instruction to clean up the data procedure for the Compliance, Security, Accountability (CSA) trucking security scoring system. While CSA Fundamentals details is no more noticeable, the SMS information that produced those CSA ratings is still available under the revamped system, and without extra context for that data, lots of might misconstrue its meaning. Popular NowOne trucker’s pulling nightmareSafety drives Australia to end pay-by-the-mileCold Weather condition Fuel Concerns: The Safe Answer is Gelling “& ldquo; For example, let & rsquo; s state a motor carrier gets 400 evaluations in a month. Is that a great or bad number? You don’& rsquo; t truly understand since there is no peer comparison,” & rdquo; she said. & ldquo; The data is a little a throwback to the method SafeStat numbers used to be shown. It’& rsquo; s great that the data shows up again, but without a frame of reference, how helpful will it ultimately be?” & rdquo; McMillan noted, however, that carriers taking a “& ldquo; positive & rdquo; safety stance shouldn & rsquo; t fear too much. & ldquo; If you & rsquo; re being proactive about security internally, you’won & rsquo; t have an issue. This [SMS] data is a lagging indicator anyways,” & rdquo; she stressed. & ldquo; It & rsquo; s those carriers that aren’& rsquo; t taking note of their CSA scores th …
See all stories on this subject

Comprehending The Minimal Value of Improved Fuel Economy

I’m always amazed at the distinction in between the things “I know” and things “I comprehend.” It advises me of Mark Twain wisdom, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into problem. It’s what you understand for sure that simply ain’t so.” A terrific example has actually been my understanding of the value of fuel economy. I’ve constantly “understood for sure” that enhanced fuel economy is good for both my wallet and the environment. I have actually also “known for sure” that the law of diminishing returns is an essential financial principle. I did not, however, understand the critical interaction between these two essential littles knowledge until I spent some time with a spreadsheet and reduced the knowledge to numbers and charts. Frankly, my inner optimist was appalled and even my inner pessimist was unpleasantly amazed. The marginal value of enhanced fuel economy fell much faster than I expected and it flat-lined very rapidly. The following graph starts with assumed fuel expenses of $2, $3 and $4 per gallon and shows the marginal value per mile for a 1-MPG fuel economy enhancement as standard fuel economy increases from 5 MPG to 50 MPG. To put the chart in context, I have actually added labels that show where the typical fuel effectiveness of 4 classes of motor vehicles fall along the continuum. A fast look at the limited value chart proves the fundamental recommendation that effectiveness gains in the least effective vehicle classes will be far more important than comparable efficiency gains in the more effective classes. However, really understanding the relative magnitude of numerous fuel economy chances needs more granular information on the typical yearly fuel consumption of cars in the various classes. My second chart sums up statistics from the Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center. The orange columns reveal the typical yearly fuel usage (expressed in gasoline-gallon equivalents) for 10 classes of motor vehicles while heaven …
See all stories on this subject

You may know another individual or company that needs auto, truck, or diesel repair... or even on site fleet service. Please tell your friends. It's much appreciated!